Negotiations 2006

County Contract Ratified...see summary below

The 2006 CEMA bargaining Team Pictured: (Front l. to r) Phil Mayer, Mark Hand, Laura Colunga, Richard Rapacchietta and Tom Starkey. (Back l. to r.) Eric Goodrich, Consuelo Collard, Theresa Nelson, Edna Esguerra and Aileen Arellano. Not Pictured: Amando Cablas and Randy Johnese (behind the camera).
Following membership meetings which were held between May 16th and May 23rd, the CEMA Bargaining Committee has finalized the CEMA Proposals which can be viewed here. These proposals will be submitted to the County at the first bargaining session which is scheduled for June 22nd. Please check this web page regularly for negotiations updates which will be posted below after each bargaining session.

For additional information or if you have a concern regarding negotiations, please contact a member of the CEMA Bargaining Committee. A list of the Bargaining Committee members can be found here.

Bargaining Updates

County Contract Ratified

A new contract between CEMA and the County of Santa Clara was ratified in membership meetings held on Sunday, August 13th and Monday, August 14th. The details of the agreement are as follows:

  1. ARTICLE 1 RECOGNITION

    New language to recognize that certain CEMA represented classifications are non-exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and, therefore, eligible to overtime compensation and that certain other CEMA represented classifications are eligible to shift assignment pay, pest advisory differential, bilingual pay and/or uniform allowance.

  2. ARTICLE 2 SALARIES
      1. Effective 8/14/06 – Agreed upon realignments (see separate Realignment document here)
      2. Effective 10/30/06 – 3%
      3. Effective 12/17/07 – 4%
      4. Effective 8/11/08 – 1%
      5. Effective 9/26/08 – Bonus equal to 2% of pay

    1. The County shall increase the level of PERS contribution for Park Ranger Supervisor and Manager Park Ranger Operations by 1 percent to a total contribution of 2 percent.
    2. The following classes shall be tied to movement in RNPA bargaining unit both for general wage movement (COLA) and realignments:
      • B05, Director of Cardiovascular Services;
      • B6F Mgr Adult Custody MH;
      • C69 Public Health Nurse Mgr II;
      • C70 Public Health Nurse Mgr I;
      • C87 Quality Improvement Coordinator - SCVMC;
      • P70 Nursing Info Systems Mgr;
      • S01 Quality Improvement Mgr – Hospital;
      • S02 Admissions & Utilization Service Mgr;
      • S03 Infection Control Nurse Supervisor;
      • S07 Quality Improvement Mgr – Amb CHS;
      • S10 Utilization Review Supervisor;
      • S12 Utilization Review Coordinator;
      • S13 Quality Improvement Mgr – MH OP;
      • S16 Director of Educ Adv Prac Nrs Quty Imp;
      • S18 Patient Services Case Coordinator;
      • S19 Utilization Review Coordinator – VHP;
      • S1T Nrs Mgr Ambulatory Care – U;
      • S20 Quality Imprv Mgr – Alc & Drg Sr;
      • S31 Nrs Mgr Cld Shlt Cstdy Hlth;
      • S42 Nrs Mgr Critical Care;
      • S43 Nrs Mgr Burn Center;
      • S53 Nrs Mgr Emergency Department;
      • S55 Nrs Mgr Operating Room Servs;
      • S61 Nrs Mgr Post Anesthesia Cr Unt;
      • S62 Nrs Mgr Rehabilitation;
      • S63 Nrs Mgr Medical Surgical Nrsin;
      • S64 Nrs Mgr Mother Infant Cr Ctr;
      • S65 Nrs Mgr Lbr Del Pernl Evl Prd;
      • S66 Nrs Mgr Artificial Kidney Unit;
      • S67 Nrs Mgr Pediatrics – ICU;
      • S69 Quality Impvmnt Mgr Inpt Nrs;
      • S71 Trauma Program Coordinator;
      • S72 Quality Improvmnt Mgr – A P Sv;
      • S77 Admin Nurse V;
      • S80 Admin Nurse II;
      • S81 Nrs Mgr Neonatal ICU;
      • S82 Nrs Mgr Ambulatory Care;
      • S84 Nrs Mgr Mental Health Nursing;
      • S90 Dir Mental Health Nursing;
      • P70 Nursing Info Systems Mgr:
      • B12 Utilization Management Q-A Mgr;
      • P62 Specialty Programs Nurse Coord.

      (The provision above will mean that those classes will receive a cost of living increase of 3% and a realignment of 2% on November 6, 2006 and a further realignment of 2% on May 7, 2007. Subsequent cost of living increases and realignments will be dependant on the provisions of the subsequent RNPA agreement.)

    3. Effective August 14, 2006 the following broad range classifications shall be converted to a five-step salary plan. The schedule will be created by starting with the maximum step and creating four lower steps with a five percent differential between each step.
      • Y50 Project Manager
      • S18 Patient Services Case Coordinator
      • S01 Quality Improvement Manager - Hospital
      • S07 Quality Improvement Manager Ambulatory CHS
      • C94 Manager of Volunteer Services
    4. Assignment Pay
      Provide that certain CEMA represented employees assigned to work evening shifts shall receive assignment pay in the amount of $320.00 biweekly. Certain CEMA represented employees assigned to work night shifts shall receive assignment pay in the amount of $580.00.
      Included are:
      • Admin Nurse II
      • Utilization Review Coord
    5. Pest Advisory Differential
      A Park Field Support Manager who obtains and maintains a valid Agricultural Pest Control Advisor License issued by the State of California and is assigned to perform pest control advisory functions shall be compensated at a range approximately 7.5% higher than that specified for regular positions in this classification. This differential shall be limited to one position in Parks.
    6. Automatic Check Deposit
      All employees hired after the effective date of this agreement shall be paid by automatic check deposit. By January 2007, all workers hired prior to the effective date of this agreement shall be paid by automatic check deposit.

  3. ARTICLE 3 RETIREMENT
    Amend PERS contract effective 12/17/07 to provide for 2.5% at 55 Retirement Formula . CEMA represented employees will pay a PERS premium of 3.931% effective that date.
  4. ARTICLE 5 INSURANCE PROGRAMS
    1. Maintain all medical, dental and vision and benefits, and County contributions toward premiums at current benefit levels with agreement to pick up any premium increases during the term of agreement.
    2. Increase County paid term life insurance to $50,000.00. Allow employees to purchase up to $500,000.00 based on annual salary. County will provide letter confirming the ability of retirees to convert to a paid life insurance amount.
    3. Employees hired on or after June 19, 2006 shall work ten (10) years for the County to be eligible for retiree medical benefits.
  5. ARTICLE 7 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
    • Increase fund to $200,000.00 per fiscal year (was $135,000)
    • Increase Tuition Reimbursement to $800.00 in FYs 2007, 2008, & 2009. (was $650)
    • Professional Development annual maximum of 1,250.00 and per occurrence of $650.00. (was $1,100.00 and $550.00)
  6. ARTICLE 9 CERTIFICATION FUND
    Increase fund to $7500.00 per year and reimburse 100% of cost of State mandated licenses and certificates. (Was $5000.00)
  7. ARTICLE 10 – TEMPORARY ASSIGNMENT RESPONSIBILITY DIFFERENTIAL (TARD)
    Eligibility to TARD occurs after 5 days (was 6)
  8. ARTICLE 11 - LATERAL TRANSFER
    Change transfer band to 12% (was 10%)
  9. ARTICLE 12 STO AND SICK LEAVE
    • Separate holidays from STO by the first pay period following Labor Day, September 4, 2006. Pay holidays as they are observed. If a CEMA level employee is required to or assigned to work a holiday, allow him/her to either take an alternate day off or receive a STO add back of eight hours.

    • CEMA and the County agree to establish a joint labor-management committee to redesign annual leave for CEMA represented employees. The goal will be to convert the STO and sick leave accruals into a single annual leave accrual and to do so in a manner that is cost neutral to both parties. The committee will meet during March and April of 2007 a maximum of ten (10) times to study the issue and form a recommendation. The committee shall make a recommendation to both the Union and the County no later than May 15, 2007. If accepted by both parties the proposal will be implemented no later than August 13, 2007.
    • Add 3 additional days of Bereavement Leave if out of state travel is required.
    • Family Care Usage
      An employee is entitled to use one-half (1/2) of his/her annual accrued leave in order to care for a sick or injured member of the employee’s immediate family requiring care. The initial period of time granted up to one full day, must be charged to the STO bank. The balance shall be charged to sick leave if necessary. “Immediate family” shall mean the mother, father, grandmother, grandfather of the employee or of the spouse of the employee or of the same sex domestic partner and the spouse, son son-in-law, daughter, daughter-in-law, brother or sister of the employee or any person living in the immediate household of the employee.
  10. ARTICLE 17 – TERM OF AGREEMENT
    August 14, 2006 through August 9, 2009.
  11. Uniform Allowance Sideletter
    Increase yearly Uniform Allowance to $500 for; Park Maintenance Supervisor, Supervising Custody Support Assistant, EMS Coordinator, Law Enforcement Records Manager, Law Enforcement Records Supervisor, the following safety classes: Park Ranger Supervisor, Manager of Park Ranger Operations shall receive $850 per year.
  12. Bilingual Sideletter
    Increased bilingual payments from one hundred-twenty dollars as follows:
    • Effective August 14, 2006 – one hundred–thirty dollars ($130) per month.
    • Effective August 13, 2007 – one hundred-forty dollars ($140) per month.
    • Effective August 11, 2008 – one hundred-fifty dollars ($150) per month.
  13. CLASSIFICATIONS
    The County agrees to provide CEMA with a letter outlining the Boards policy on reclassifications, a procedure for departments to submit reclassification requests and a procedure for employees to appeal the failure of a department to follow through on a reclassification request where it is required.

    Agreement to complete the following classification reviews within the next year: Hiedi Hudson (Sr. Health Care Program Manager), Philip Chantri (Election Services Coordinator) and Amy Brinkman-Viall (Prevention Program Analyst II).

    Agreement to complete a classification study on:  Anne Perkins (Rehabilitation Srv Program Rep), Dolores Alvarado (Maternal Child & Adol Health Div Dir), Grace Jimenez (Data Processing Supervisor), Karin Accorinti (Election Recruiting &Training Sup) and Jenny Howard (Ambulatory Service Manager) within twelve months.

  14. Labor/Management IB Committee
    During the term of this agreement the County and CEMA will jointly participate in a Interest Based Committee to discuss:
    1. Training Programs for new CEMA bargaining unit employees,
    2. CEMA/County participation in regional health care cost containment,
    3. Improvement of the CEMA performance appraisal process, and
    4. Problems with dues processing.
    The Committee will convene it’s first meeting no later than November 1, 2006.
  15. Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
    The following classes are covered by the Fair Labor Standard’s Act (FLSA) and shall receive compensory time off for hours worked over forty in any week or, in the case of safety employees, eighty in a pay period. Compensatory time shall be earned at the rate of one and one half hour for each overtime hour worked.
    Included classes are:
    • Assoc Mgmt Analyst A
    • Assoc Mgmt Analyst B
    • Citizenship Coordinator
    • Health Care Analyst I
    • Health Care Program Analyst Assoc
    • Human Relations Coord I
    • Mgmt Aide
    • Supv Probation Counselor
    • Park Ranger Supervisor
    These classifications shall not be eligible for Admin Leave.

A tentative agreement (TA) was reached with the County at approximately 10 pm on Saturday. Please attend one of the membership meetings on Sunday and Monday for details.
***
The CEMA Bargaining Committee has met for 12 - 14 hours every day this week. We expect to meet until late Friday and all day Saturday. Please plan to attend one of the Membership Meetings on Sunday and Monday to hear the resluts of our efforts.

August 7, 2006 The CEMA and County Bargaining Committees met at 1:30 pm and the County presented CEMA with the following proposal:
  • Wages: The County's offer remains
    • 3% effective the pay period following ratification
    • 4% effective February 11, 2008 - almost 2 months after the 3.931% deduction begins for the PERS upgrade
    • 1% effective August 11, 2008
    • a lump sum equal to 2% of annual salary paid on September 26, 2008
  • Language on 'Assignment Pay' for nursing classes working shifts but "...with respect to other classes, the County is not willing to entertain a differential...but is willing to study a list provided by CEMA to consider making realignment adjustments."
  • Retirement - 2.5% @ 55 effective 12/17/07 but employees must pay a 3.931% premium effective that date.
  • Retiree Medical Benefits - "Employees hired on or after June 19, 2006 shall work ten (10) years for the County to be eligible for retiree medical benefits."
  • Life Insurance - Increase County paid life insurance from $25,000 to $50,000 and allow CEMA level employees to purchase up to $500,000 of Supplemental Life Insurance based upon the employee's salary.
  • Scheduled Time Off (STO) - "Separate holidays from STO as soon as practicable. Pay holidays as they are observed. If an employee is required to or assigned to work a holiday, the employee shall receive an alternate day off.

    The County proposes to establish a committee to study the feasibility of converting the STO Bank to and annual leave progam provided that the conversion is cost neutral. This would then be subject to negotiation in a subsequent contract

  • Bereavement Leave - The County will provide CEMA members with the same bereavement leave as other County Employees.
  • Uniform Allowance - Increase from $400 to $500 per year and the County will entertain a higher amount for safety classes if CEMA submits a list of the uniform requirements with specific costs.
Following the presentation of their counter-proposal, the County stated that they expected CEMA to make a significant reduction in their realignment proposal as part of their next counter proposal. The parties then adjourned and the CEMA Committee went into caucus on a response until 9:30 pm.

August 6, 2006 County responded to CEMA's modification of it's realignment proposal by presenting the following counter:

County Realignment Proposal #2 8/6/06 at 4 pm
ClassificationProposed % realignment
Accountant III1
Admin Director, Lab3
Assessment Roll Admin4
Asst Admin Director Lab3
Assistant Chief Appraiser2
Asst Chief Auditor Appraiser2
Asst Dir of Pharmacy Services4
Asst Tech Planning & Ctl Mgr1.5
Assoc Mgmt Analyst A1
Assoc Mgmt Analys B1
Chief Communications Disp4
Chief of Design Services5
Chief Respiratory Care Practnr8
Clinical Biochemist3
Clinical Microbiologist3
Communications Engineer4
County Communications Ast Dir4
County Networks Manager1
County Webmaster3
Customer Support Services Manager1
Data Processing Staff Assist2
Data Processing Supervisor3
Dept Fiscal Officer3
Diagnostic Imaging Asst Dir3
Dir of Diagnostic Imaging2
Dir of Pharmacy SVCS SCVHHS4
Division Mgr-Clk of the Board3
Employment Program Supv3
Fleet Maintenance Supervisor2
Health Program Mgr I1
Health Program Mgr II1
Information Systems Mgr II1
Information Systems Mgr III1
IT Planner/Architect1
Janitor Supervisor1
Laudry Services supervisor1
Local Area Network Specialist1
Mapping & I.D. Supervisor2
Mat Child & Adol Hlth Div Dir3
Mgmt Analyst1
Mgr of Park Maintenance Svcs1
Mgr Training and Staff Dev1
Network Designer2
Network Operations Supv2
Pretrial Prg Mgmt Spec1
Principal Planner4
Project Support Svcs Manager1
Public Health Nurse Mgr I5
Public Health Nurse Mgr II5
Road Operations Superintendent1
Sr Accountant3
Sr Communications Dispatcher4
Sr Diagnostic Img Info Sys Spc1
Sr Planner4
Sr Systems Software Engineer2
Supv Account Clerk II2
Supv Appraiser1
Supv Assessment Clerk1
Supv Auditor-Appraiser2
Supv Diagnostic Imag Tech2
Supv Environmental Health Spec1
Supv Indexer1
Supv Pharmacist4
Supv Recordable Doc Tech1
Supv Respiratory Care Practnr8
Systems & Program Mgr1
Tax Roll Mgr1
Training & Staff Dev Spec1
Trust & Fiduciary Accnting Mgr1
* For any class not listed the County is proposing nothing.
** The total cost of this proposal is $833,118.50.

CEMA Made the following response:

CEMA Counter-Proposal On Realignments - 8/6/06 at 9:00 pm
ClassificationProposed % realignment
Accountant III3
Admin Director, Lab9
Admin Nurse V5
Admin Services Mgr I3
Admin Support Officer III1
Ambulatory Service Mgr9
Assessment Roll Admin4
Assoc Mgmt Analyst A1
Assoc Mgmt Analyst B1
Asst Admin Director Lab9
Asst Chief Appraiser7
Asst Chief Auditor Appraiser7
Asst Dir of Pharmacy Services10
Asst Tech Planning & Ctl Mgr1.5
Business Mgr-Clk of the Board3
Cancer Care Program Coordinator15
Central Service Mgr-SS8
Chief Clin Neurophysiolc Tech3
Chief Communications Disp4
Chief of Design Services5
Chief Respiratory Care Practnr8
Children's Services Mgr5
Clinical Biochemist9
Clinical Microbiologist9
Communications Engineer4
Communications Engineering Mgr2
Community Librarian5
Coord of Programs for Disabled3
Cottage Manager1
County Communications Ast Dir4
County Networks Manager5
County Webmaster7
Customer Support Services Mgr5
Data Base Admin Mgr5
Data Processing Staff Assist9
Data Processing Supervisor12
Dept Fiscal Officer5
Diagnostic Imaging Asst Dir9
Diagnostic Imaging Info SS II6
Diagnostic Inaging Info Sys Mg8
Dir of Diagnostic Imaging9
Dir of Environmental Svcs HHS2
Dir of Pharmacy Svcs SCVHHS10
Division Mgr-Clk of the Board3
Election Division Coord3
Election Recrt & Trng Supv10
Electrical Systems Supervisor2
Employment Program Supv3
Equal Oportunity Officer3
Exemption Supervisor2
Fleet Maintenance Supervisor2
Fleet Services Coord5
Grounds Supervisor1
Head Cook2
Health Care Fin Analyst I6
Health Care Fin Analyst II6
Health Care Fin Analyst Assoc6
Health Care Program Anal Assoc20.98
Health Care Program Analyst I3
Health Care Program Mgr I5.5
Health Care Program Mgr II6.5
Healthcare Serv Bsns Dev Anal5
Housekeeping Serv Section Mgr2
Information Systems Mgr I1
Information Systems Mgr II1
Information Systems Mgr III1
Internal Auditor III1.5
IT Planner/Architect2.5
Janitor Supervisor1
Laundry Services Supervisor3
Liability Claims Adjuster II1
Liability Claims Adjuster III1
Local Area Network Specialist4
Managing Dietitian3
Mapping & I. D. Supervisor5
Mat Child & Adol Hlth Div Dir28
Mental Health Prog Spec II3
Mgmt analysis Prog Mgr I3
Mgmt Analyst1
Mgmt Info Svcs Mgr II6
Mgr of Park Maintenance Svcs6
Mgr Patient Accounting SCVHHS5
Mgr Training and Staff Dev1
Network Designer2
Network Operations Supv5
Nursing Info Systems Mgr9.37
Operations Mgr Family Support1
Park Field Support Mgr7.5
Park Maintenance Supervisor6
Payroll Manager2
Pretrial Prg Mgmt Spec2
Program Mgr I3
Project Mgr3
Project Support Svcs Mgr8
Property Transfer Supv3
Public Health Nurse Mgr I20
Public Health Nurse Mgr II19
Recorded Documents Mgmt Cord2
Records Mgr-Clk of the Board1
Rehabilitati0on Srv Prog Rep20
Road Operations Superintendent2
Road Ops Supt-Pest Conrl Advs2
Social Services Prg Mgr I4
Social Services Prg Mgr II4
Social Services Prg Mgr III4
Specialty Programs Nurse Coord10
Sr Accountant3
Sr Call Center Coordinator2
Sr Communications Dispatcher4
Sr Corr Training Specialist3
Sr Diagnostic Img Info Sys Spc8
Sr Health Care Prog Analyst3
Sr Health Care Program Mgr30
Sr Info Techology Project Mgr3
Sr Internal Auditor3
Sr Mgmt Analyst3
Sr Planner4
Sr Programming Analyst2
Sr Systems Software engineer2
Sr Training & Staff Developmnt3
Sr Hlth Care Fin Analyst6
Steril Process Education Cord0
Supv Account Clerk II2
Supv Appraisal Data Coord3
Supv Appraiser8
Supv Assessment Clerk3
Supv Auditor-Appraiser8
Supv Deputy Public Guardian0
Supv Diagnostic Imag Tech6
Supv Environmental Health Spec2
Supv Estate Administrator0
Supv Family Support Officer4
Supv Health Services Rep II3
Supv Indexer3
Supv Internal Auditor3
Supv Legal Clerk1
Supv Paralegal0
Supv Pharmacist10
Supv Recordable Doc Tech5
Supv Respiratory Care Practnr8
Systems & Program Mgr6
Tax Roll Mgr4
Technical Services Mgr5
Telephone Services Engineer2
Traffic Painter Supv2
Training & Staff Dev Spec3
Trauma Program Coord2
Trust & Fiduciary Accntng Mgr4
The total cost of this proposal is $3,425,661.51

August 5, 2006 CEMA and the County met at 8:30. The County presented CEMA with their first response on realignments. They began by stating that CEMA's proposal was way too costly at nearly $8 million. They then presented us with the following proposal:

County Realignment Proposal #1 8/5/06 at 10 am
ClassificationProposed % realignment
Accountant III1
Admin Director, Lab1
Assessment Roll Admin1
Assistant Chief Appraiser1
Asst Chief Auditor Appraiser1
Asst Dir of Pharmacy Services2
Asst Tech Planning & Ctl Mgr1
Assoc Mgmt Analyst A1
Assoc Mgmt Analys B1
Chief of Design Services2
Chief Respiratory Care Practnr3
Clinical Biochemist2
County Webmaster3
Dept Fiscal Officer2
Diagnostic Imaging Info Sys Mg1
Diagnostic Imaging Info SS II3
Employment Program Supv2
Dir of Pharmacy SVCS SCVHHS1
Mgmt Analyst1
Mgmt Info Svcs Mgr II2
Mgr Training and Staff Dev1
Network Designer1
Network Operations Supv2
Public Health Nurse Mgr I3
Public Health Nurse Mgr II3
Sr Accountant1
Sr Planner1
Sr Diagnostic Img Info Sys Spc1
Supv Appraiser1
Supv Auditor-Appraiser1
Supv Environmental Health Spec1
Supv Pharmacist2
Systems & Program Mgr1
Trust & Fiduciary Accnting Mgr1
* For any class not listed the County is proposing nothing.
** The total cost of this proposal is $356,756.

The CEMA Bargaining Committee then spent the remainder of the day re-examining the CEMA realignment proposals and, at 8:30 pm, presented the County with the following counter proposal:

CEMA Counter-Proposal On Realignments - 8/5/06 at 8:30 pm
ClassificationProposed % realignment
Accountant III3
Admin Director, Lab12
Admin Nurse V5
Admin Services Mgr I3
Admin Support Officer III3
Ambulatory Service Mgr10
Assessment Roll Admin4
Assoc Mgmt Analyst A1
Assoc Mgmt Analyst B1
Asst Admin Director Lab12
Asst Chief Appraiser7
Asst Chief Auditor Appraiser7
Asst Dir of Pharmacy Services12
Asst Tech Planning & Ctl Mgr1.5
Business Mgr-Clk of the Board5
Cancer Care Program Coordinator32.5
Central Service Mgr-SS8
Chief Clin Neurophysiolc Tech5
Chief Communications Disp4
Chief of Design Services5
Chief Respiratory Care Practnr8
Children's Services Mgr5
Clinical Biochemist12
Clinical Microbiologist12
Communications Engineer4
Communications Engineering Mgr2
Community Librarian5
Coord of Programs for Disabled3
Cottage Manager1
County Communications Ast Dir4
County Networks Manager5
County Webmaster8
Customer Support Services Mgr5
Data Base Admin Mgr5
Data Processing Staff Assist10
Data Processing Supervisor15
Dept Fiscal Officer6
Diagnostic Imaging Asst Dir12
Diagnostic Imaging Info SS II6
Diagnostic Inaging Info Sys Mg8
Dir of Diagnostic Imaging12
Dir of Environmental Svcs HHS2
Dir of Pharmacy Svcs SCVHHS12
Division Mgr-Clk of the Board3
Election Disision Coord3
Election Recrt & Trng Supv10
Electrical Systems Supervisor2
Equal Oportunity Officer3
Exemption Supervisor3
Fleet Maintenance Supervisor2
Fleet Services Coord10
Grounds Supervisor1
Head Cook2
Health Care Fin Analyst I8
Health Care Fin Analyst II8
Health Care Program Anal Assoc20.98
Health Care Program Analyst I3
Health Care Program Mgr I5.5
Health Care Program Mgr II6.5
Healthcare Serv Bsns Dev Anal10
Housekeeping Serv Section Mgr2
Information Systems Mgr I2
Information Systems Mgr II2
Information Systems Mgr III2
Internal Auditor III2
IT Planner/Architect2.5
Janitor Supervisor1
Laundry Services Supervisor4
Liability Claims Adjuster II2
Liability Claims Adjuster III2
Local Area Network Specialist5
Managing Dietitian5
Mapping & I. D. Supervisor6
Mat Child & Adol Hlth Div Dir28
Mental Health Prog Spec II3
Mgmt analysis Prog Mgr I3
Mgmt Analyst1
Mgmt Info Svcs Mgr II6
Mgr of Park Maintenance Svcs9
Mgr Training and Staff Dev1
Network Designer2
Network Operations Supv5
Nursing Info Systems Mgr9.37
Operations Mgr Family Support1
Park Field Support Mgr7.5
Park Maintenance Supervisor9
Payroll Manager2
Pretrial Prg Mgmt Spec3.5
Program Mgr I3
Project Mgr5
Project Support Svcs Mgr10
Property Transfer Supv6
Public Health Nurse Mgr I21
Public Health Nurse Mgr II20
Recorded Documents Mgmt Cord3
Records Mgr-Clk of the Board1
Rehabilitati0on Srv Prog Rep20
Road Operations Superintendent2
Road Ops Supt-Pest Conrl Advs2
Social Services Prg Mgr I5
Social Services Prg Mgr II5
Social Services Prg Mgr III5
Specialty Programs Nurse Coord10
Sr Accountant3
Sr Call Center Coordinator3
Sr Communications Dispatcher4
Sr Corr Training Specialist3
Sr Diagnostic Img Info Sys Spc8
Sr Health Care Prog Analyst3
Sr Health Care Program Mgr30
Sr Info Techology Project Mgr5
Sr Internal Auditor5
Sr Mgmt Analyst3
Sr Planner4
Sr Programming Analyst3
Sr Systems Software engineer2
Sr Training & Staff Developmnt3
Sr Hlth Care Fin Analyst8
Steril Process Education Cord1
Supv Account Clerk II2
Supv Appraisal Data Coord3
Supv Appraiser8
Supv Assessment Clerk4
Supv Auditor-Appraiser8
Supv Deputy Public Guardian1
Supv Diagnostic Imag Tech6
Supv Environmental Health Spec2
Supv Estate Administrator1
Supv Family Support Officer4
Supv Health Services Rep II3
Supv Indexer5
Supv Internal Auditor5
Supv Legal Clerk5
Supv Paralegal1
Supv Pharmacist12
Supv Recordable doc Tech8
Supv Respiratory Care Practnr8
Supv Revenue Collections Ofc1
Systems & Program Mgr6
Tax Roll Mgr5
Technical Services Mgr5
Telephone Services Engineer3
Traffic Painter Supv2
Training & Staff Dev Spec3
Trauma Program Coord2
Trust & Fiduciary Accntng Mgr5
The total cost of this proposal is $3,950,835.72

August 3, 2006 The County takes a step backward. The County began this session by proposing major revisions to language on Alternate Work Schedules which had previously been agreed to in principal. (see posting for July 20th below) In addition to changes in the language, the County proposed to add a new paragraph that negated the whole agreement. Someone at 70 W. Hedding does not want any language that would imply that CEMA level employees could have a regular schedule. When CEMA protested that the County was making the problem worse, the County suggested that we "park" the issue and move on to the next issue. Fine, now we have a wreck in the parking lot - call it 'Alternate Work Schedules'.

We then spent the rest of the day discussing problems with reclassification and actually made some progress on listing possible solutions for reclassification problems. The bargaining session adjourned without a final resolution of this issue.

We will be bargaining on both Saturday, August 5th and Sunday, August 6th. Summaries of those sessions will be posted as soon as possible following the sessions.

July 24, 2006 CEMA and the County met for a full day bargaining session. The County began the morning by presenting CEMA with their first comprehensive proposal and response to CEMA's proposal. The County's Proposal was:
  • Salary
    1. Effective the pay period following ratification - 3%
    2. Effective February 11, 2008 - 4%
    3. Effective August 11, 2008 - 1%
    4. Effective September 26, 2008 - Lump sum payment equal to 2% of annual salary.
  • Realignments - The County is not prepared to respond to realignments at this time.
  • Automatic Check Deposit - The County wants all employees paid by automatic deposit by January, 2007.
  • Retirement - The County proposes to go to the '2.5% at 55 formula' effective December 17, 2007. Effective that date the County proposes to begin deducting 3.931% to pay for it. (Please note that the County proposes to begin this deduction two months before they propose to increase CEMA wages to cover the deduction.)
  • Insurance Premiums - The County states that employees hired after June 19, 2006, shall work ten (10) years to be eligible for retiree medical benefits. (Note that the County is not proposing this change. They claim that it is an accomplished fact based on the 715 agreement. CEMA disagrees with the County's interpretation of the law on this matter.)
  • Professional Development Fund - The County agrees to increase the Professional Development Fund from $135,000 to $200,000.
  • Tuition Reimbursement - The County agrees to increase the tuition reimbursement maximum from $650 per year to $800 per year.
  • Professional Development Funds - The County proposes to increase the maximum draw from $1,100 to $1,250 per year and the maximum per occuraence from $550 to $650.
  • State Mandated Licensure/Certification Fund - increase the fund from $5,000 per year to $7,500 and increase reimbursement limit from $150 to the full cost (no limit).
  • Temporary Assignment Responsibility Differential (TARD) - The County proposes to change payment from 6 days or more to 5 days or more.
  • Lateral Transfer - The County agrees to increase the band from 10% to 12%.
  • STO and Sick Leave - The County is not yet prepared to respond to CEMA's proposal.
Finally the County stated that any CEMA proposal not otherwise responded to should be considered rejected. The CEMA team then caucused and made the following Response and Counter-Proposal:
  • Salaries -
    1. Effective 8/14/06 - 4%
    2. Effective 811/07 - 4%
    3. Effective 8/10/08 - 2%
  • Supervisory Range - Proposes that Supervisory salaries are intended to be at least 10% above their subordinates and that, if CEMA determined that the range between any supervisor and his/her subordinates was less than 10%, the County would agree to bargain (meet and confer) with CEMA over a remedy.
  • Park Ranger Supervisor and Manager Park Ranger Operations PERS Contribution - propose that the County contribute at the same level for these classes as they do for Probation Manager and Supervising Probation Counselor (7%).
  • CEMA RN classes tied to RNPA raises - proposed that, should RNPA wages increase, the County would immediately meet with CEMA to adjust the salaries of these classes accordingly.
  • Broad Range - Propose that CEMA represented Broad Range classes except Budget and Public Policy Analyst, Agenda Review Administrator, Budget Operations Manager, and Principle Budget and Public Policy Analyst receive cost of living adjustments (COLAs) on the dates stated above for salary adjustments.
  • CEMA Premiums - We modified the proposed compensation to 3% and divided the proposed 'Management Premium' up as follows:
    1. Stand by / On Call - for managers regularly scheduled stand by or on call shifts
    2. Call Back - for managers who are responsible for twenty-four hour functions that regularly require return to work at hours other than the manager's regularly scheduled hours or on weekends.
    3. Registrar of Voters - during peak work periods when work week exceeds 50 hours for two or more pay periods.
    4. Hazardous Duty - for managers who regularly work in proximity to inmates of the jail, juvenile hall, either of the juvenile ranches or any of the locked acute psychiatric facilities.
  • Longevity - propose two longevity steps of 5% each after 36 at step 5 in a CEMA class and again after 36 months at step 6.
  • Realignments - Still waiting for County response.
  • Assignment Pay -
    1. Evening Shift - $320 for nursing classes and $200 for non-nursing classes
    2. Night Shift - $580 for nursing classes and $240 for non-nursing classes
  • Retirement - We agreed to the '2.5% at 55' formula effective 12/17/07 and that CEMA members would contribute 3.931% for that benefit effective that date.
  • Sick Leave conversion to PERS credit - We withdrew this proposal.
  • EMS Coordinator Safety Retirement - Proposed that CEMA and the County jointly request that PERS rule on the eligibility of this class for safety retirement.
  • Current Benefits - CEMA continues to propose that the County pick up any increases in premiums.
  • Delta Dental - CEMA proposes that County increase the annual caps on basics and prosthodontics and the lifetime cap on orthodontics to $2,500 and that they change the co-pay from 75-25 to 80-20.
  • Retire Health - We reject the County's proposal to increase the qualifying period to 10 years and we propose to add vision and dental.
  • Vision coverage - Increase coverage for exams, frames and lenses every 12 months with no deductible. Add laser eye surgery as a covered benefit.
  • Professional Development and Tuition Reimbursement - Tentative Agreement (TA) with County proposal.
  • Licensure/Certification Fund - TA County's proposal.
  • TARD - TA County's Proposal
  • Lateral Transfer - TA
  • STO and Sick Leave (Paid Time Off) - Waiting for County response.
  • Uniform Allowance - CEMA proposes $850 per year.
  • CEMA data and membership issues - still unresolved.
  • Fair Labor Standars Act (FLSA) - CEMA and the County have agreed on which CEMA classes will be eligible to overtime and how they will be compensated. We are waiting for a written agreement.
  • Automatic Deposit - CEMA agrees to managements proposal but requests that some language be included should an employee be without a checking account
Following the presentation of the CEMA Response and Counter-Proposal, the County's spokesperson stated that the parties were clearly very far apart. He also indicated that he was disappointed that CEMA made so little movement. CEMA's spokesperson stated that this was the County's first comprehensive proposal and that CEMA was using its counter to emphasis that the CEMA membership was not looking for a cookie cutter version of the 715 agreement. We want something that recognizes the special needs of middle management and which provides some recognition for their efforts over the past few years in particular. With that the parties adjourned.

July 20, 2006 The CEMA bargaining Committee and the County met for a full day. The primary focus of discussion was language providing for alternate work schedules for CEMA members. It appears that the parties are very close to agreeing on this issue. The second topic of discussion was was concerns that the County has with the lay off process. There has been no resolution to these issues yet.

The next bargaining session is scheduled for Monday, July 24th at that time the County is expected to make a comprehensive response to CEMA's proposals.

July 18, 2006 The CEMA Bargaining Committee met with the County team for a couple of hours primarily to submit the detail on the CEMA realignment proposal. You can view the CEMA proposal here. This is our initial realignment proposal and, as such, it must be noted that the final agreement will probably be very different.

In addition to a brief discussion of the realignment proposal, the County gave CEMA the estimated costs for some of the CEMA proposals. By the County's calculation, the first year cost of CEMA's proposal (excluding realignments) is more than $37 million.

July 14, 2006 CEMA presented the County with a list of classes that would be affected by our management premium proposal. The County presented CEMA with several documents for costing various CEMA proposals. There was general discussion as to how proposals would be costed. The Session ended with CEMA Chief Spokesperson, Tom Starkey, stating that the CEMA membership was looking for an agreement that reflected the County's appreciation for the additional work that mid-managers have pick up over the past several years as the County has down-sized. Tom asked that the County take a close look at the CEMA proposal for the expressed needs of the CEMA membership as mid-managers. He also stated that this cannot be a copy of the 715 agreement. CEMA members do not receive many of the benefits that 715 members do. So, CEMA needs a contract that uniquely addresses the CEMA membership's needs.

July 12, 2006 CEMA and the County met for 7 hours. The parties began the day by agreeing that they could not reach agreement on the issue of Open Negotiations. The County indicated that they were not willing to allow CEMA members to observe the bargaining. CEMA informed the County that they would be filing an Unfair Labor Practice charge with the Public Employee Relations Board.

We went on to discuss CEMA's management premium proposal and our proposal for assignment pay for shift assignment. Management raised questions about which classifications and positions would be affected by these proposals. Next we discussed our proposal to set a minimum supervisory range of 10% and our proposal to link certain nurse management classifications to subordinate nurse classes when the RNPA negotiates raises. The County indicated that they had serious concerns about both of these proposals as they would commit the County to automatically grant wage increases in the future. The County also indicated that they would look at dealing with problems with broadrange classes by taking all or some of them back to steps. They explained that they would do this by placing the 5th step at the top of the broad range and the 4th step 5% below that, the 3rd step 5% below that etc.

After lunch, CEMA gave the County the following wage proposal:

  • 5% effective August 13, 2006
  • 5% effective August 11, 2007
  • 1% effective August 10, 2008
We then spent some time explaining CEMA's PTO proposal which would replace STO and sick leave.

Finally, the County responded to our longevity proposal stating that it is too costly (approximately $8 million according to the County), that they only do longevity where they have recruitment and retention problems and that, where they have longevity pay, it has caused promotional issues and problems with compaction. In other words they said, "No."

July 8, 2006 - CEMA and the County met for 7 hours on Saturday. There were primarily two topics of discussion.

First was continued discussion of the bargaining process. At issue is the provision for Open Negotiations in the CEMA by-laws (Article 14.3). The parties are discussing this in an interest based process but do not appear to be close to an agreement.

The second issue is CEMA's proposal to include language regarding alternative work schedules in the contract. The parties are close to agreement on this and are working out language.

Note: CEMA's complete realignment proposal is due to be presented on 7/18. We will post a copy of the proposal following that meeting.

June 29, 2006 - CEMA finished explaining its proposals. The County then presented eight proposals:
  1. Performance Appraisals
    Revisit the jointly developed process with a view to making it more efficient.
  2. Lay off / Recall Procedures
    Develop processes whereby lay offs and recalls consider any specialty skills required for specific positions within the same job classifications.
  3. Broad Range Salaries
    Examine the appropriate relevancy of broad range classifications.
  4. FLSA Issues
    Review appropriate FLSA classification revisions necessitated by changes to the Fair Labor Standards Act>
  5. Personal Leave
    Explore alternative leave system that encourage appropriate attendance practices.
  6. Bargaining Processes
    Examine the bargaining process in order to arrive at a mutually agreeable process.
  7. Applying County wide provisions to CEMA.
    Review County practices with other bargaining units with a view to extending certain provisions to CEMA
  8. Compensation
    Provide a fair compensation package taking into consideration the fiscal realities facing the County.

The parties then spent the remainder of the day discussing the bargaining process.

June 22, 2006 - First bargaining session held. CEMA presented it's proposals. The parties discussed bargaining ground rules and confirmed additional dates for bargaining. Tom Starkey explained CEMA's proposals and answered questions from the County's Bargaining Team. The following bargaining dates have been set: June 29, July 6, 14, 20, and 24, August 3. The full week of August 7 has be reserved as the CEMA contract expires on August 13. All bargaining sessions are scheduled to begin at 9:00 am and to last until at least 5 pm.